Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/10/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Underexposing Leica M8
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Tue Oct 9 08:52:37 2007
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20071008084025.024fcc10@comporium.net> <662F5B7D-743D-49AB-A925-72005EA6B397@comcast.net> <59E35F91-354F-4AE6-ABC0-6754BD4812A1@cox.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20071008124156.025aee30@comporium.net> <470A8622.9070306@numericable.fr> <7.0.1.0.2.20071008155140.02590170@comporium.net> <A2CC37D1-AFFA-4227-9F4E-D4FA1B04EB50@mac.com> <003c01c80a65$51655830$9600000a@dell810>
Both my DMR and M8 are set to -2/3 as normal. Of course conditions
and/or desired effects can alter that setting.
I believe the difference (between the Leicas and, in my case, Canon)
rests with the difference between the CCD and CMos; as well as the
bit depth difference.
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com
On Oct 9, 2007, at 6:12 AM, Fred Hess / Phenix Visuals NL wrote:
>> The DMR also prefers underexposure.
>
> How many stops???
In reply to:
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Underexposing Leica M8)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Underexposing Leica M8)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Underexposing Leica M8)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Underexposing Leica M8)
Message from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] Underexposing Leica M8)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Underexposing Leica M8)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Underexposing Leica M8)
Message from fredhess at phenix-visuals.nl (Fred Hess / Phenix Visuals NL) ([Leica] Underexposing Leica M8)