Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Oh god, I'm thinking of trying a Tri-Elmar 28/35/50. Tell me I'm insane.
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Sun Sep 30 06:47:44 2007
References: <002501c8035c$b5fa1840$6400a8c0@corp.nortel.com>

Hey Vick,

Did you not claim awhile back to STOP buying?

But for rehab quitters, the Tri-Elmar is a very nice lens.

Chris



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vick Ko" <vick.ko@sympatico.ca>
To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 6:23 AM
Subject: [Leica] Oh god,I'm thinking of trying a Tri-Elmar 28/35/50. Tell me 
I'm insane.


> Oh god, I'm thinking of trying a Tri-Elmar 28/35/50.  
> 
> Tell me I'm insane.
> 
> Or tell me that it is the best thing that I could be doing, and why I
> haven't done it yet.
> 
> I'm thinking only of the 2nd version, with DOF scale and 46mm filter.  Is
> that the sensible one to get?
> 
> Vick
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

Replies: Reply from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Oh god, I'm thinking of trying a Tri-Elmar 28/35/50. Tell me I'm insane.)
In reply to: Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Oh god, I'm thinking of trying a Tri-Elmar 28/35/50. Tell me I'm insane.)