Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] SLD ? R9.99 ? Link is OK now
From: glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer)
Date: Thu Sep 20 17:06:29 2007
References: <092020070210.762.46F1D6A8000ACFAF000002FA219791332903010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com> <3cad89990709192024p6865a3d2u2e5081dc108de6b1@mail.gmail.com>

Jay,

Do you know what a naif is?  A person who is naive.  A lot of us have to 
buy Leica goods on the used market
as we cannot afford the new stuff..  A lot of us cannot declare Leica 
purchases as a deductible business expense.

I dinna care to help Leica survive.  Being on Social Security , I want 
to survive.

Jerry


Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
> What amuses me in this whole exchange of emails is, save the M8/DMR, nobody
> seems to buy anything made by Leica new. If Leica don't sell lenses, where
> will they make their annuity income from? I don't think they make much 
> money
> on camera bodies. I think the whole point of the new Summarit lenses is to
> maximise the profitable end of the business - a wise business move, and one
> that will pay off a lot more than an M9 or R10. If the members of the list
> wish to strengthen Leica so they can survive, buy their lenses new - or buy
> ala carte bodies!!!
> Cheers
> Jayanand
>
>
> On 9/20/07, grduprey@mchsi.com <grduprey@mchsi.com> wrote:
>   
>> George,
>> I can't agree with you too much.  I have an SL, R4SP, and a R8, which I
>> bought thinking I would get a DMR.  Can't afford one now, but maybe I can
>> find one at a good price, or the R10 will come out with a good
>> price.  ;-)  I have a D200, but find I pick up the R8 90% of the time.  
>> The
>> D200 has some neat features, but the R8 and the R glass is my first 
>> choice,
>> period.  No uncertainty at all.
>>
>> Gene
>>
>> -------------- Original message from Lottermoser George 
>> <imagist3@mac.com>:
>> --------------
>>
>>
>>     
>>> 2 R3's, R8, R8 with DMR and all of my R glass I've purchased used. No
>>> uncertainty. The lenses will last the rest of my life. I have no
>>> doubt the R8 and R8/DMR will also outlast me. What's the problem? If
>>> Leica never comes out with another R body - what's the problem with
>>> the stuff you have and inventory available on a good, solid used
>>> market? Sorry. I just don't get it.
>>>
>>> If you feel less "uncertain" in the Nikon "forever" better and better
>>> world - that's just fine. Enjoy. The image, after all, is all that
>>> really matters. And for that - all you need is an oatmeal box and
>>> some tin foil. ;~)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> George Lottermoser
>>> george@imagist.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 19, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Christopher Birchenhall wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> As to the DMR I have to
>>>> note I bought a R8 planning on gettig a DMR only to find Leica pulling
>>>> that plug without a hint as to what the future of the R mount might
>>>> look like. Here the uncertainty is for me real and is reflected in my
>>>> actions - back to Nikon SLRs for me.
>>>>         
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> L
>   


Replies: Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] SLD ? R9.99 ? Link is OK now)
In reply to: Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com) ([Leica] SLD ? R9.99 ? Link is OK now)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] SLD ? R9.99 ? Link is OK now)