Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The Enduring Populatity of Film
From: crbirchenhall at googlemail.com (Christopher Birchenhall)
Date: Wed Sep 19 12:36:52 2007
References: <1190224740.46f16364d4b01@panthermail.uwm.edu> <067d01c7fae8$a95ba260$fc12e720$@net>

Jim

Thanks for the link. Not sure I would go as far as this

''In fact, now that the honeymoon and the infatuation is starting to
run its course,'' he said, ''I think that in the next five years
you're going to see almost a retro backlash because of the things that
film gives you that you can't get with digital.''

but film works for me and it is my digital cams that gather dust.

Chris B


On 19/09/2007, Jim Shulman <jshul@comcast.net> wrote:
> >From today's New York Times
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-Photographers-Film.html
>
> Jim Shulman
> Bryn Mawr, PA
> Who agrees that digital imaging robs of him of valuable computer time--time
> better spent viewing porn.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] The Enduring Populatity of Film)
In reply to: Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (amr3@uwm.edu) ([Leica] Re:PAW 25 - Waders at Lyme Regis)
Message from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] The Enduring Populatity of Film)