Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Contrast WAS IMG: PAW 35 dlridings
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Tue Sep 4 12:41:05 2007
References: <46DBF0A2.5080409@dlridings.se> <002e01c7ee81$59e6d380$6401a8c0@asus930> <46DCF5C7.6070904@dlridings.se>

Hi Daniel,
Is that an absolving pose?
And the other one, is sheer Ingmar Bergman. Which goes well with  
absolution, no? ;-)
Thanks for showing,
Philippr



Op 4-sep-07, om 08:05 heeft Daniel Ridings het volgende geschreven:

> G Hopkinson wrote:
>> Daniel, charming scenery. You haven't entirely sold me on the old  
>> Elmar, except maybe the shot of the curtained window. Lovely
>> subtle tones work well there. Do you prefer the softer contrast  
>> and veiling for the atmosphere in the contre-jour bicycle shots?  
>> Cheers
>> Hoppy
>
> Such philosophical questions you ask!
>
> I never thought of it that way. I don't walk around with a lot of  
> equipment so it is rarely the case that I use one lens over another  
> because I "prefer" it. It is usually just what I have with me. I  
> always have the Leica IIIf with me, no matter what. Even my wife  
> notices if I get into the car and she doesn't see it. She'll make a  
> remark that I've forgotten something.
>
> I use the various stuff because I still have a childish fascination  
> for things photography. Never really grew up :-)
>
> But ... now I'll get philosophical ... I do prefer low contrast to  
> high contrast. I can always add contrast, but it is hard to take  
> away. I don't have a comparable shot from this week, but if you  
> look in my shoebox:
>
> http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/2007v35/07v35-0015.jpg.html
>
> There's one of Ewa. It's not even a high contrast scene. But the  
> background is almost gone to black.
>
> That was a higher contrast rendering Nikkor (28mm AIS).
>
> The most modern Leica lenses I have are from the 1970's, so I can't  
> say much about them.
>
> But it just dawned on me. I have a similar shot taken at the same  
> time of the day on the same path:
>
> http://www.dlridings.se/paw/2007/13.html
>
> I wouldn't say that a modern (17-55 Nikkor) lens does so much better.
>
> There are certain situations that are simply going to wipe out on  
> you. Your choice is not in lenses, but whether or not you take the  
> shot.
>
> I take the shot.
>
> Best,
> Daniel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from dlr at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] IMG: PAW 35 dlridings)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG: PAW 35 dlridings)
Message from dlr at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Contrast WAS IMG: PAW 35 dlridings)