Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/09/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Leica answer
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Sat Sep 1 06:51:18 2007
References: <200708302250.l7UMn80s070193@server1.waverley.reid.org> <7FC7D214-D6C9-4651-9E41-7132BF8F8E0A@optonline.net> <p06230909c2fe26c97cd2@[10.1.16.131]> <002b01c7ec25$edb621f0$2101a8c0@luispersonal>
Not "better." Different and, as in all print making processes, in the
hands of a master of their craft, equally as beautiful; however, with
different qualities to appreciate.
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com
On Aug 31, 2007, at 6:23 PM, Luis Ripoll wrote:
> I continue asking me, even the
> digital quality (B&W) has been improved, if is better or not than a
> Baryta
> print.
In reply to:
Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Leica answer)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Re: Leica answer)
Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] Re: Leica answer)