Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: M8 review, M9 anticipation
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Wed Aug 8 19:08:36 2007
References: <006f01c7d9be$555cb0a0$4872ea04@oemcomputer> <IPEJJPIMDEGNKCCLEDOHIEMFIPAA.joelct@singnet.com.sg>

Well, I still use my Nikon D70, but I cant get any sort of resale/exchange
deal worth the money. My M3 still fetches a prince's ransom in comparison. I
have decided to keep using the D70, and finally convert it to infrared....
Cheers
Jayanand

On 8/9/07, Joseph Low <joelct@singnet.com.sg> wrote:
>
>         Gentlemen
>
>         Built in obsolescence has been the credo of Japanese manufacturers
> since
> the
>         Industrial revolution followiig WWII
>
>         I continue to use my 20D and have no problems yet
>
>         As with all hobbies - some buy the latest equipment - others use
> them as
> tools
>
>         Joseph Low / Singapore
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+joelct=singnet.com.sg@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+joelct=singnet.com.sg@leica-users.org]On Behalf Of
> Montie
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 9:16 PM
> To: lug@leica-users.org
> Subject: [Leica] Re: M8 review, M9 anticipation
>
> I quite agree, Nathan.  Clever marketing serving the
> quest for increasing the "bottom line" seems to overload
> bona fide technical advancement at times.
>
> The target is always that sizable segment of picture takers
> (pro and amateur) who feel challenged unless they're using
> the latest gear...as if that could give them a better handle
> on the discipline  ;-)
>
> Montie
>
> >>I think the whole obsolescence argument is overdone. I am happily using
> a Canon 1D Mark II, bought second-hand in 2005 and released (I think in
> 2004). There is Mark III now, and I am sure there will other models
> within the next year. So what? The camera has a shutter rated at 200000
> exposures; between me and the first owner we have taken about 50000
> pictures with it, so from a mechanical point of view it should continue
> to function just fine for quite a while. And the key thing is that my
> pictures taken with it do not suddenly get worse just because a new
> model has been released.
>
> Clearly, no digital camera will ever match the useful life of an M3. But
> on the other hand, to say that the useful life of a modern DSLR is equal
> to the product release cycle is simply bunk.
>
> Nathan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from montoid at earthlink.net (Montie) ([Leica] Re: M8 review, M9 anticipation)
Message from joelct at singnet.com.sg (Joseph Low) ([Leica] Re: M8 review, M9 anticipation)