Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It's a lot easier to soften an image because of too much detail than to get more detail out of a soft lens, though. Optically, the Summilux looks a lot better, no? Thanks for showing, Philippe Op 8-aug-07, om 08:46 heeft Peter Klein het volgende geschreven: > Last weekend I took a few M8 shots of some friends as we hiked in a > Seattle park along the water in the late afternoon. Among those > pictures were two, similarly lit, of the same three people, but > taken with two different lenses. The size of the faces on the > images are almost the same, inviting comparison. > > One lens was an old Canon Serenar 50/1.8 from the 1950s, recently > CLAed by DAG. The other was a current 35 Summilux ASPH. > > Take a look at these 100% crops of a face. Put them side by side > if you can. This is not a resolution contest. It's simply a > comparison of how the lenses draw, under similar (not absolutely > identical) conditions. > > Here is the old Canon 50/1.8, 1/90 at f/11 > http://users.2alpha.com/~pklein/temp/L1001098-1to1-50-1_8Canon-w.jpg > > And here is the 35 Summilux ASPH, 1/180 at f/8. > http://users.2alpha.com/~pklein/temp/L1001109-1to1-35LuxAsph-w.jpg > > Both were processed in Capture One with the same white balance > (5000K), and with sharpening at the first "notch." Both are one > stop down from their best aperture. Both shots used an IR filter > (I have a 40mm lens hood/Series VI filter holder for the Canon, and > the 39mm B+W IR filter fits in nicely).The warmer picture (the > Canon) was actually taken about an hour earlier, so the warmth is > in the lens, not the time of day. Canon 1/90 at f/11, Lux Asph > 1/180 at f/8, both one stop narrower than their probable best > apertures. > > On the M8 sensor, the Lux is resolving a little bit more detail in > the hair. But that's not what's really important. The Canon has > less microcontrast, and there's a definite "glow" to the image. > It's also a much kinder lens. The Lux ASPH is mercilessly sharp > and contrasty. > > My suspicion is at least one aspect of the elusive "Leica Glow" has > to do with the way that bright areas diffuse slightly into adjacent > dark areas. An optical "flaw," but one that has a very pleasant > effect under the right circumstances. > > On film, my favorite 50mm lens, the DR Summicron, draws very much > like the Canon. Which makes me all the more eager to try the latter > on the M8. Anyway, Sean Reid is right, those old designs make > great sunny-day lenses. And they are a lot kinder to people over 25! > > --Peter > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >