Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/07/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT Pentax K10d opinions
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor)
Date: Mon Jul 30 20:56:59 2007
References: <a3f189160707301623u1dc5689eq591648c189c08803@mail.gmail.com> <200707302346.l6UNkYjI049115@dragonsgate2.imagecraft.com> <0A6EC412-0DF3-4C4E-9A51-92ED0CAFE540@ciudad.com.ar> <440b792d0707301955r487d4690vbd7b409ecd7498f2@mail.gmail.com>

Mehrdad - I've had my K10D for about nine months and 8000+ exposures  
now and am delighted with it.  The kit lenses aren't all that great  
but the other Pentax lenses are and you can use all the old K and  
screw thread mount lenses, too, if you have them.  I routinely use my  
old M lenses (from my ME) on it and just picked up a really sharp 200  
mm M lens for $95 to add to my set.

The camera has held up well though the spring return on the preview  
lever died after about 15,000 flicks.  (I copied more than 5,000  
slides with the K10D and the Pentax 50 mm Macro.)  I'm using the  
camera with the lever broken because I don't want to not have it long  
enough to get it repaired.

I used the 200 for the first time on the water last weekend  
photographing a regatta and the manual focus, green-button exposure- 
set routine was no issue even in that fast-moving setting.  Best of  
all, the pictures look great.   I've used the IS often with good  
results though not on the boat because the rolling motion from the  
waves can make the control loop bottom out.

The 21 mm lens is a good one though I haven't had occasion to use it  
much yet.  The Sigma 10-20 zoom is a real winner, too.  It spends a  
lot of time on the camera.

I say go for it.

Regards,

Dick



On Jul 30, 2007, at 10:55 PM, mehrdad wrote:

> funny, i was just shooting with a k10d. it is a very nice compact good
> handling and quick camera and it has IS built in. pentax has rolled
> some new and very small (in size)  prime lenses for this camera all
> very good. the 21,40,70 (all 35mm focal length),  the high iso is good
> and u have a lot of choices for lens from old and new. the 12-24 is
> also very nice. on the long end there is nothing on the market till
> later this year when they are planning to roll out some new lenses.
> all the new lenses are "pro level" with  supersonic motors built by
> tokina with pentax spec and coating. the 16-50 and 50-135 both sealed
> and usm will be out in august sometime. i did have a d200 and sold it
> cuz this one is smaller and as good. i do enjoy the built in IS. the
> quailty of the images also very well when shooting raw (i have never
> tried jpeg).
>
> On 7/30/07, Eduardo Albesi <eduardoalbesi@ciudad.com.ar> wrote:
>> I had never considered a Pentax before. Immune to the Spotmatic myth
>> from the Asahi Pentax era, I really never ever touched either a
>> K1000, an ME Super, or their younger brethren.
>>
>> Well, I will be traveling soon and then I found myself in (mental)
>> need of something to attach a tele lens to, typically a DSLR. Tried
>> the Viso route, but that's not for me... The DMR is out of range, as
>> I would rather prefer to spend that amount of money in some M lenses,
>> if I had it (the $$$).
>>
>> After an unfortunate misadventure with a Canon 5d, I sold it and was
>> heading again to the Nikon stable after some years of absence.
>> D200 or D80? Well, a decision not that simple... I prefer using SD
>> cards, as I have already lots of them since the M8 entered my life...
>> OTOH, I have some really precious Nikkor AI and AIs glass from
>> yesterday (24/2, 35/1.4, 85/1.4, the mythical 55/3.5 and 105/2.8
>> Micro-Nikkors, etc)
>> But, one will not meter with the AIs, the other feels too heavy in my
>> hands after months of using only the M8...
>>
>> Last Friday, I entered a shop and was handed a K10d... wow... what a
>> camera.
>> It looks and feels as designed for being used...
>> I wondered, could I? Should I?
>>
>> I know some Luggers here are Pentax dslr users. Please let me know
>> your real world real users opinions.... what do you like of it and
>> what do you feel it lacks
>>
>> Reading the reviews (and I have read almost everything about it on
>> the net), it looks like the camera of the year, it has lots and lots
>> of useful features that users of other brands seem to have been
>> forever claiming for.
>>
>> How about the lenses? I remember some Takumars of grand fame, and
>> some highly regardedSMC Pentaxes  (as the 85/1.4)- I have a Pentax
>> 645 and I like its lenses performance, much better than their
>> Mamiya's counterparts for instance... Anything similar will make me
>> happy. And furthermore, those 21mm, 40mm and 70mm Limited pancake
>> lenses look very yummy..
>>
>> I will really appreciate any opinions you may give on or offlist
>> Thank you  in advance,
>>
>> Ed
>> ps. sorry for the long post
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> -- 
>   -------------------------------------
>   regards, mehrdad
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] OT Pentax K10d opinions)
Reply from pmcc_2000 at yahoo.com (pmcc) ([Leica] watered drinks)
In reply to: Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] OT adapter)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] OT adapter)
Message from eduardoalbesi at ciudad.com.ar (Eduardo Albesi) ([Leica] OT Pentax K10d opinions)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] OT Pentax K10d opinions)