Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/07/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] CAL/repair of beaten up M3 - shutter repair..., viewfindercontrast
From: alex at zabrovsky.com (Alex)
Date: Sat Jul 14 05:34:17 2007
References: <000701c7c611$d8ad05b0$6400a8c0@corp.nortel.com>

If that is the case, do you think such things can be repaired for a 
reasonable charge ? I've heard pretty much everything that required 
rangefinder/VF intrusion is very expensive...

Alex

Vick Ko wrote:

>There is a large prism assembly that all the VF light goes through, and this
>is glued together.  It could be very possible that the glue is aging
>(Canadian balsam).
>
>Vick 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lug-bounces+vick.ko=sympatico.ca@leica-users.org
>[mailto:lug-bounces+vick.ko=sympatico.ca@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Alex
>Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 9:12 AM
>To: Leica Users Group
>Subject: Re: [Leica] CAL/repair of beaten up M3 - shutter repair...,
>viewfindercontrast
>
>Thanks.
>Actually, RF patch is quite good, the overall finder look-though is somewhat
>less contrasty then when looking through my M6 finder.
>
>Alex
>
>Vick Ko wrote:
>
>  
>
>>You won't know until Youxin opens them up.  
>>
>>On the jammed-closed one, likely the felt light trap has fallen into 
>>the shutter tape.  It is an easy fix but needs disassembly of the 
>>camera, including removing the rangefinder arm.
>>
>>As for the one that is open, you won't be able to see the curtain edges 
>>easily.  But they are likely there.
>>
>>Old M3 RF patches will fade with age.  It is natural.
>>
>>Vick
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: lug-bounces+vick.ko=sympatico.ca@leica-users.org
>>[mailto:lug-bounces+vick.ko=sympatico.ca@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
>>Alex
>>Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 7:40 AM
>>To: Leica Users Group
>>Subject: [Leica] CAL/repair of beaten up M3 - shutter 
>>repair...,viewfinder contrast
>>
>>I'm getting ready to ship two of our M3 beaten up bodies to get 
>>CLAed/repaired in US (presumably by Youxin Ye).
>>Both have shutter/winding stack, one in closed position (curtain 
>>appears to be OK), the other one in fully opened position.
>>The second one, with fully opened shutter makes me worry: I can't see 
>>any signs of curtain present there. The film gate is fully opened, 
>>there is not curtain edges visible at either side of the gate.
>>Does that mean there is no curtain ? (perhaps it has separated and got
>>lost) ?
>>
>>Assuming this is the case, does that sound like quite expensive shutter 
>>repair ? What do you think ?
>>
>>Also, comparing the viewfinder of both M3's with my M6, the finder of 
>>both m3's looks considerably less contrasty then of M6, though frames 
>>and focusing appear to be fine. The image though M6 finder appears to 
>>be clearer due to higher contrast. Is that normal for M3s ?
>>
>>Thanks, Alex
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>


Replies: Reply from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] CAL/repair of beaten up M3 - shutter repair..., viewfindercontrast)
In reply to: Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] CAL/repair of beaten up M3 - shutter repair..., viewfindercontrast)