Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/07/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Richard I do so for snaps, for instance here our puppy gallery http://mogool.com/nica/ or my friend, the farmer's website http://andyheinz.ch/fotogalerie.html Those I want to put in my personal online photogalleries will need editing. I did a photoshop action converting all scanned TIFFs and into JPGs to have an overview (on the Epson I have RAW+jpg mode mostly). Lots of quite good pictures, I would say an average 1-2 per roll, but almost all need editing. The problem is finally a time problem. Should post less on the LUG and work more on my galleries ;-) Didier >It just means that you have to be more ruthless when editing: if pictures >are for family and friend snaps, then who care? Just mass convert them to >JPG, throw away the really bad ones, and you are done. If the pictures are >more for "artistic" purposes (photographically speaking), then it should be >easy to delete 80% of the stuff at first pass. If your hit rate is much >higher than that, than you wouldn't be reading my drivel anyway so it >doesn't matter :-) > >At 02:00 AM 7/6/2007, Didier Ludwig wrote: >>Nathan >>Editing is definitely the bottleneck of my photo workflow, too. Shooting >>is easy. But afterwards... Have thousands of scanned and unedited film >>pictures from the past years, and since I have a R-D1, the amount of >>unedited RAWs is even more growing. Maybe I should lock all my cameras >>until I have worked off that huge picture pile... or must I wait until my >>retirement?... >>Didier > >// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please >use richard at imagecraft.com)