Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/06/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Printer Purgatory
From: heninger at adobe.com (Wade Heninger)
Date: Fri Jun 15 08:26:50 2007

Man, I wish you all would stop talking about the 3800 being better than the
2400.

I purchased the 2400 about a month before the 3800 came out and it still
hurts...



On 6/15/07 8:09 AM, "Leonard Taupier" <len-1@comcast.net> wrote:

> Mark,
> 
> You're so right. My son did the math for me and convinced me the 3800
> was worth the extra initial cost in ink savings alone. It's a joy not
> having to replace cartridges all the time like I did with the 1800.
> 
> Len
> 
> 
> On Jun 15, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 6/15/07 10:16 AM, "Leonard Taupier" <len-1@comcast.net> typed:
>> 
>>> Peter,
>>> 
>>> You've been getting some good advice since this post but let me add
>>> my .02
>>> 
>>> I only use Epson printers. I have the R800, the R1800 and the Pro
>>> 3800. Both the R800 and R1800 are wonderful printers for color and
>>> especially for glossy prints. I bought the 3800 primarily for b&w
>>> printing as this is where the other two are lacking. I cannot get a
>>> true black image from either. There is always a slight purple cast to
>>> the print. The gloss optimizer gives the 800 and 1800 a clear edge
>>> over the 3800 for glossy color prints.  I have never had an ink clog
>>> with any of the printers. The 3800 and it's little brother the 2400
>>> were optimized for the best possible b&w prints. There is no color
>>> cast. Since you don't need the larger printer I would get the 2400
>>> and not play around with the R200 or R300 which may not do the job
>>> for you.
>>> 
>>> Oh. I also only use Epson ink.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Len
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Just a note brought out in a shutterbug article on the 3800.
>> 
>> When you buy a 3800 you are getting in effect 500 dollars with of
>> pigment
>> ink.
>> 
>> Subtract that from the cost of the printer it is cheaper than the
>> 2400.
>> 
>> This and the more modern print engine and the fact that its not
>> that big
>> even if you mainly did letter sized prints the 3800 would still be
>> maybe
>> your best bet. I'd say for sure the one to get.
>> 
>> I don't think Peter, as I know him, would want a printer with gloss
>> optimizer designed for glossy color non pigment prints but just the
>> opposite.
>> 
>> Matt pigment black and whites.
>> 
>> It used to be Epson had a letter sized version of their pigment
>> printers.
>> For some reason that's not the case any more.
>> 
>> But the 2400's not worth it compared to the 3800. A printer you can
>> really
>> fly with. Sets you free.
>> 
>> Rock and Roll
>> 
>> Mark Rabiner
>> Harlem, NY
>> 
>> markrabiner.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
w a d e  h e n i n g e r
u s e r  e x p e r i e n c e
a d o b e  s y s t e m s ,  i n c



Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Printer Purgatory)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Printer Purgatory)
In reply to: Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Printer Purgatory)