Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Another Leica poem : The Leicaslackers (M2 Division) Lament
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Sun May 13 13:54:54 2007
References: <005b01c7959e$8e6e4070$a992883e@GeeBee>

How well does it describes our addiction :-)
Philippe


Op 13-mei-07, om 22:37 heeft geebee het volgende geschreven:

> I wrote this in 2001 just before I started posting PAW and I used  
> to have it on my first web site:
>
> Sitting around admiring my Leica
>
> Never dreaming of taking a shot
>
> Dressing it like a chrome coloured Barbie
>
> With the few accessories I?ve got
>
> The incredibly weighty Summicron
>
> The meter, booster and close up specs
>
> The satisfying click as the lens locks
>
> The photo equivalent of sex?
>
>
>
> Then one fateful night on the Internet
>
> Just surfing around for a while
>
> An H.C.B. decisive moment
>
> My random, chance encounter with Kyle
>
> He describes my attitude to the Leica
>
> With uncanny insight and precision
>
> He has me rolling around with laughter
>
> And inspires me to a decision
>
>
>
> Next time I go out with a camera
>
> No more of equipment overkill
>
> I?ll be travelling light with the Leica
>
> Meter, body and the 50 mill
>
> But talk is cheap unlike the old Leica
>
> And words are much easier than deeds
>
> And I?m soon scouring all of the used ads
>
> To satisfy additional lens needs
>
>
>
> This attempt to get value for money
>
> Is going entirely the wrong way
>
> The 35 and 90 Summicrons
>
> Are going to cost several weeks pay
>
> But how can I justify such outlay
>
> When I?m no more than a camera geek?
>
> Then Kyle gives me the justification
>
> I?ll need them for my " picture a week"
>
>
>
> I spend one thousand plus on the lenses
>
> In search of good value? That?s funny!
>
> Then of course there is the web site software
>
> Which in turn will cost still more money
>
> I need to get the best from my scanner
>
> So I purchase something called Vuescan
>
> Read about it on the Lug, where else?
>
> I hope it?s not money down the pan
>
>
>
> The next software is Cyber View Image
>
> I need it to get a good jpeg
>
> This purchase must be some kind of mistake
>
> It didn?t cost an arm and a leg
>
> I must carry a camera at all times
>
> If I?m to feed the picture a week
>
> Which in turn means a point and shoot camera
>
> One used Minilux. SOLD! To the geek
>
>
>
> I know I have to improve my technique
>
> Before I show photos to the group
>
> I need tips about street photography
>
> Best methods, tricks of the trade and soup
>
> My searching takes me to Johnny Deadman
>
> As sites go this is one of the greats
>
> He?s helpful and expert and I?m convinced
>
> I need a Sekonic L308
>
>
>
> So it?s back to the ads for a bargain
>
> I know it?s madness! I know I?m skint!
>
> My credit card is frayed at the edges
>
> And there is still no sign of a print
>
> Speaking of prints, I want them in mono
>
> But my printer prints with a red cast
>
>
>
> That means the "Peizo plunge" and Cone Software
>
> Stop!! Stop! The money just wont last
>
> But if I stop now it?s been for nothing
>
> Except the fun of owning the gear
>
> But looking again at the lugger sites
>
> Fills me with an all consuming fear
>
> And its funny how everyone else's pictures
>
> Look better when you get your own site
>
>
>
> And from being sure that I could hack it
>
> Well; now I only think I just might
>
> There?s Wajsman, Berube and George Callender
>
> Kyle, Tina, Bill in Denver and LeHuray
>
> I will never get results like they do
>
> No matter how I pump in the money
>
> And all those dead links on "who?s doing paw"
>
> What happened? Where are they? What went wrong?
>
>
>
> Did they blow out their brains in frustration?
>
> Or quit and sell their gear for a song?
>
> Yet some guys routinely post great pictures
>
> You doubt me? Can I prove it? You bet!
>
> Go check out SonC?s "Kathy" and "Jackson"
>
> And Brownlow pictures jump right out of the set
>
> So now I am faced with a real dilemma
>
> Will picture a week really be fun?
>
>
>
> Do I declare my site and post pictures?
>
> Or give in to temptation and run
>
> Do I sit silently in the background?
>
> Read lug postings for my daily fix
>
> Or get out and about with a Leica?
>
> Then give luggers access to my pics
>
> As I take stock of the situation
>
> This one thing is abundantly clear
>
>
>
> So far I have spent a bloody fortune
>
> To justify expense on previous gear
>
> Well that?s it. No more fancy equipment
>
>> From now, money goes on film not gear
>
> For better or worse week one is posted
>
> If you want to see it, it?s here. www.g
>
>
>
> Sorry luggers I chickened out. I?m sure you are a really nice bunch  
> but I am intimidated by the quality of your photography, your
> gear, your CV?s. You name it; I?m intimidated by it. Looking on the  
> bright side I now have more toys (yes I really did make those
> purchases) to play with even though I know money doesn?t make good  
> photographs. My web site is up with a few photographs, mainly
> Olympus some Leica, to aid with site layout etc. On Jan 1 2002 I  
> fully intend to start posting a Leica shot each week but as for
> giving you guys the address? I don?t know if I?ll ever have the  
> balls, maybe I could buy a set, where?s that credit card?
>
> p.s. love the Minilux, what a pity they don?t do extra lenses for it.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



In reply to: Message from geebee at geebeephoto.com (geebee) ([Leica] Another Leica poem : The Leicaslackers (M2 Division) Lament)