Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: PAW (*) 2007 #20
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Sun May 13 13:17:04 2007
References: <5f1be6b50705131308g633a75b7ne055230e9873c900@mail.gmail.com>

Les impressive from a light and shadows point of view, but there si a  
stroy in this one, that can be interpreted in different ways.
Which makes it more interesting IMO. Some post processing (looks very  
grainy/noisy, or is that jpg grain aliasing?) to boost it contrast  
and midtone wise might make it stronger, too.
Thanks for showing,
Philippe



Op 13-mei-07, om 22:08 heeft David Keenan het volgende geschreven:

>> But I'm not very sure about the bottom part of the image.
>
> Philippe --
>
> I know that I can count on you for an honest art director's point  
> of view.
>
> I understand and appreciate your comment. Thanks.
>
> I *am* finding it harder and harder to top myself each week... ;)
>
> This was my second
> choice<http://www.david-keenan.com/displayimage.php?album=29&pos=4>
> .
>
> Dave.
>
> -- 
> Web Site: www.david-keenan.com
> 2007 PAW: www.david-keenan.com/paw
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Re: PAW (*) 2007 #20)
In reply to: Message from ausdlk at gmail.com (David Keenan) ([Leica] Re: PAW (*) 2007 #20)