Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 05:58 PM 5/7/2007, Jim Cheatham wrote: >Has anyone had experience with the Photar lenses? I do >a lot of macro work and am tempted. What are the pros >and cons, characteristics of each, etc.? I can't find >examples of shots with the different lenses? Any >ideas? Thanks. - Jim Cheatham Jim I have a fairly extensive collection of Leitz Micro-Summars, Milars, and Photars, Zeiss Mikrotars and Luminars, and B&L Micro-Tessars, along with a slew of other such macro lenses such as 60mm and 74mm f/4 Carl Zeiss S-Planars. I generally use these with a bellows rig on my Hasselblad 2000 FC/M but I have on occasion used them with a Visoflex III and Bellows II on my M6, and generally shoot chromes. All of these lenses are quite useable but the Leitz Photars and the Zeiss Luminars are the best of the bunch in general terms. They require a LOT of care in use, of course, due to a VERY fine depth of field. For general work, a 25mm or 50mm lens would be a good starting place. I do have a number of slides taken with these lenses but these are not at hand so I cannot scan and send them. Marc msmall@aya.yale.edu Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!