Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] PAW - M8 Noctilux f/1.0 (was back focus...)
From: faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman)
Date: Fri Apr 27 09:35:48 2007
References: <82c9dd70704261956l440c2a7ex79ba33106725bce4@mail.gmail.com> <8c8849060704270844n5af2ca38n7455da0051b1d331@mail.gmail.com>
 
Nope - no problem at f/1.0 (that shot)
Just above that, the back focus is so severe as not to include what you are
focusing on.

Eric

On 4/27/07, Jerry Justianto <jsjgroups@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't see any problem at all?
>
> Anyway Noctilux, as my friend said, is not about technical terms, is
> about 'aura'
>
> Hopefully my M8 will arrive tomw, cant wait to try my Nocti with it.
>
> JSJ
>
> On 4/27/07, Eric Korenman <faneuil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > More M8 Noctilux focus experimenting- No more rulers.
> >
> > My daughter at f/1.0
> > http://tinyurl.com/2fwjua
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to: Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] PAW - M8 Noctilux f/1.0 (was back focus...))
Message from jsjgroups at gmail.com (Jerry Justianto) ([Leica] PAW - M8 Noctilux f/1.0 (was back focus...))