Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/03/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Considering a Backup Reflex...R4?
From: john.o.newell at comcast.net (John O. Newell)
Date: Wed Mar 28 16:28:18 2007
References: <032820071401.7175.460A75540009FCB300001C07220075033004040A990A02D201D202080106@comcast.net><460A7EFE.8080801@numericable.fr> <20070328145848.GB26675@panix.com>
Thanks, Rei, that cracked me up - I was thinking the same thing.
John
> i like the R4 quite a lot.
> i think the price reflects not so much a dearth of
> functionality of even usability but the steep risk premium
> of being particularly hard/expensive to repair if they go bad.
>
> they say in the bond business: "there are no bad bonds, just
> bad prices," and $200 is a good price.
In reply to:
Message from john.o.newell at comcast.net (J. Newell) ([Leica] Considering a Backup Reflex...R4?)
Message from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] Considering a Backup Reflex...R4?)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] Considering a Backup Reflex...R4?)