Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Considering a Backup Reflex...R4?
From: shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka)
Date: Wed Mar 28 06:58:52 2007
References: <032820071401.7175.460A75540009FCB300001C07220075033004040A990A02D201D202080106@comcast.net> <460A7EFE.8080801@numericable.fr>

i got an R4 as an SL2 backup.  (i captured the
pair for posterity for wikipedia)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:R4-sl2-600.jpg

i like the R4 quite a lot.
i think the price reflects not so much a dearth of 
functionality of even usability but the steep risk premium 
of being particularly hard/expensive to repair if they go bad.

they say in the bond business: "there are no bad bonds, just
bad prices," and $200 is a good price.

-rei

On Mar28 16:43, Philippe Amard wrote:
> John,
> 
> the R4 has produced wonderful pictures ans still wil, depending of 
> course on many other factors - if price is an issue then go for an R4, 
> you'll enjoy a convenient and efficient program mode but no TTL flash.
> 
> Phil...x
> 
> J. Newell wrote:
> 
> >I've been thinking about buying a second reflex body as a backup for my 
> >(knock on wood) trusty R6.  I've found an R4 that looks like a good 
> >candidate at $200.  It has some cosmetic issues but overall is not bad.  
> >The serial number is over the 1,6xx,xxx level that seems to be the 
> >cut-off 
> >for early electronic problems.  The only real functional gripe I've got 
> >is 
> >that not having the shutter speeds back-illuminated seems like a 
> >handicap, 
> >especially in lower light or against dark backgrounds.  Then again, this 
> >would just be a backup body, and an RE or R5 is going to be a lot more 
> >expensive, I think.
> >The question is: is $200 such a good price, considering the intended 
> >purpose, that I should live with the R4's ergonomic limitations (compared 
> >to an RE, R5 or even an R4s-P, all of which seem to be a good bit more 
> >expensive)?  There is no right answer, but if anyone has opinions I'm 
> >interested in hearing thoughts.
> >Thanks - John Newell
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Leica Users Group.
> >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> > 
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

-- 
Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
Ridgewood, New Jersey


Replies: Reply from john.o.newell at comcast.net (John O. Newell) ([Leica] Considering a Backup Reflex...R4?)
Reply from john.o.newell at comcast.net (John O. Newell) ([Leica] R4...can you turn this thing off?)
Reply from lwwesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] Considering a Backup Reflex...R4?)
In reply to: Message from john.o.newell at comcast.net (J. Newell) ([Leica] Considering a Backup Reflex...R4?)
Message from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] Considering a Backup Reflex...R4?)