Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Smiles
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Sun Mar 25 14:58:12 2007
References: <241113.69327.qm@web35610.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <005a01c76ef9$4eae3420$ec0a9c60$@net>

A well made picture, Jim. Not so easy to catch that baby smile.
May just end up on a wall, I think.
Cheers
Hoppy

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Jim Shulman
Sent: Monday, 26 March 2007 02:19
To: 'Leica Users Group'
Subject: [Leica] Smiles

Remembered a thread a few days back about pictures with smiles, or ones that
cause them.  (I really loved the Hell station, especially after filling up
the '57 Dodge the other day with premium!_

On Friday visited a friend in the area, who just gave birth to a baby boy in
January.  Xander is her joy and a triumph--the first successful birth after
a decade of fertility treatments.  He's out of his "strangers virus"
quarantine period, so we were vetted for a visit.

http://tinyurl.com/2g9gur

They told me no flash; I told them no problem.  Used my digital M3, with old
Summilux 50 and Ilford XP2 digital film.  When they asked me how I could
take pictures in such low light without an in-camera flash, I began talking
about 1956 technology.

Best,
Jim Shulman
Bryn Mawr, PA  Who's off to pick up the prints.


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from bill_clough at yahoo.com (Bill Clough) ([Leica] Panhandle: Clarendon sandstorm)
Message from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] Smiles)