Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm not quite sure how I got this... But in my opinion, Lightroom blows Aperture away in terms of speed and smoothness, and integration with Photoshop. I love it, but it does not, repeat "not," replace Photoshop. On 3/6/07 5:27 PM, "Simon Ogilvie" <simon.ogilvie@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Wade, > > I did expect you to be biased, but I still value your opinion! What do you > think makes it better than Aperture? > > Simon. > > On 06/03/07, Wade Heninger <heninger@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On 3/6/07 8:10 AM, "Simon Ogilvie" <simon.ogilvie@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Has anyone done a comparison of these three? >>> >>> I'm a Mac user and have used CS2 before on a PC, but need to choose >>> something to buy for my new Macbook. CS3 is the obvious choice given my >>> past use of CS2, but it's too expensive, and I only use the >> photographer's >>> tools in it, not the graphic designer parts. So Lightroom and Aperture >> are >>> the obvious replacements, but will they do all I need and which will be >>> easier to learn for a CS2 user? >>> >>> I've downloaded the Aperture 30-day trial and so far don't find it very >>> intuitive. I guess I'm too used to CS2... >> >> >> I'm biased, but I think Lightroom is much better than Aperture. >> >> You can get a 30 day demo from the adobe website... >> >> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >> w a d e h e n i n g e r >> u s e r e x p e r i e n c e >> a d o b e s y s t e m s , i n c >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information