Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Carl, Thanks very much for the picture of your raw developer experiment For an idea of Silky Pix potential (which I have settled on as my standard M8 DNG Developer) please: 1.) Open folder with Silky Pix, 2.) Choose a DNG photo, open it 3.) Set camera setting to (Auto- Silky Pix AWB) 4.) That action will bring up two eye droppers below the white balance icon (white sun) the left one is grayscale(for white balance) the right one is skin colour 5.) Try one or other until the colour looks good 6.) for pictures at ISO 2500 in Natural (noise reduction sharpness) Box click "noise reduction priority" 7. Set contrast to taste 8. Develop and save and (perhaps) be amazed. Please forgive me if these instructions seem too basic - Silky Pix is a simple program. Cheers Howard (in Hong Kong) On 21 Feb 2007, at 1:07 PM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote: > Message: 21 > Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:18:01 -0500 > From: Carl Muckenhirn <carlmuck@verizon.net> > Subject: [Leica] Raw "developers" > To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > > This new digital camera stuff is getting to be fun. > > Over the last 2 weeks since I got my M8, I've been (like most here) > trying to figure out how to get the best quality out of it. I've > played with LightRoom, Capture One, SilkyPix, RAW Developer, > Photoshop 3/ACR, BibblePro, just about everything I can get free or > for a demo. > > Whilst playing with these I noticed that some tools required a little > more "tweaking" than others, what I really found interesting was how > differently these tools rendered the DNG files. So I selected a > picture (nothing exotic about it other than that I was wearing a > magenta shirt!) and "developed" it in each of the above programs, a > little Photoshoping and this is the result: > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/carlmuck/PlayingwithM8/Developer- > L1000110.jpg.html > > > All I did was open the file, using the defaults and do an "auto WB." > The results were quite interesting. I had expected to have pretty > similar results, you can see that there is quite a bit of difference. > > c. > >