[Leica] So after lusting after the classical 35mm Summicrons, I read tha

Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] So after lusting after the classical 35mm Summicrons, I read that the 40mm Summicron-c is a better lens.
From: vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko)
Date: Tue Feb 13 18:16:47 2007

So after lusting after the classical 35mm Summicrons (non-ASPH), I read that
the 40mm Summicron-c is a better lens.

Is that so?  Anyone have experiences with both, and can comment?

Even better is that I have a 40mm Summicron-C, and can stop thinking that I
need to spend more money.

regards
Vick

Replies: Reply from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] So after lusting after the classical 35mm Summicrons, I read that the 40mm Summicron-c is a better lens.)
Reply from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] So after lusting after the classical 35mm Summicrons, I read that the 40mm Summicron-c is a better lens.)