Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Kodak BW400CN 220 ??
From: faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman)
Date: Sun Feb 11 18:21:06 2007
References: <82c9dd70702111336u16a98b10g428525da83b68a19@mail.gmail.com> <C1F529D5.44697%mark@rabinergroup.com>

XP2 is interesting film.
more contrast, 'grain' than 400CN and not as much llattitude, but neat film.

Eric


On 2/11/07, Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> On 2/11/07 4:36 PM, "Eric Korenman" <faneuil@gmail.com> typed:
>
> > Yes - have shots tons of TCN and BW400CN in 35mm and 220 format.
> > Probably the most versatile film, creamy-skin toned film I have ever 
> > used.
> >
> > I thik 220 CN has been phased out.
> > Would love to have 220 XP2 or HP5 to shoot.
> >
> > Eric
> >
>
> Ilford never made xp2 in 220 or I'd be shooting it all the time. Darn.
>
> Mark Rabiner
> New York, NY
> 40?47'59.79"N
> 73?57'32.37"W
>
> markrabiner.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] Re: Kodak BW400CN 220 ??)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: Kodak BW400CN 220 ??)