Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, I object to filters that have their own postcode and cost as much as a Mazda. Being more on topic, did anyone notice that Ric has achieved this high saturation sky without a pol? On Reala I think. That's the wonderful 21 asph earning its keep. I had a similar experience with the 28, although I was shooting Velvia100F. Anyhoo, don't need no stinkin' pol. Cheers Hoppy -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Mark Rabiner Sent: Friday, 9 February 2007 14:13 To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Week 5 and WayBack 5 posted On 2/8/07 9:48 PM, "Ric Carter" <ricc@mindspring.com> typed: > God no, I don't think I could afford a polarizer for the 21;^) > > Photoshop levels. > > Thanks > > Ric > > They don't even have to be circular so you can get a cheaper one. Get an octagon one! Much cheaper I'm sure. 55mms is small compared to the average filter all those DSLR guys get with their 2.8 Yuban coffee can zooms. 77mm is the standard now!!! I remember when it was 52mms for Nikon, 55mms for Canon, 48mms for Olympus. ...like it was sunny yesterday! And 43mms for Olympus Pen F That's the ticket. Mark Rabiner New York, NY 40?47'59.79"N 73?57'32.37"W markrabiner.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information