Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IR filters
From: len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Mon Feb 5 18:56:17 2007
References: <9DBA19FE-B9A7-4E6A-91CA-7BAD8F518147@mac.com> <4cfa589b0702051638p6936979fp1650267ac9ce07d4@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Adam,

Take a look at this site and this page in particular.

<http://www.naturfotograf.com/UV_IR_rev03.html#top_page>

He covers every aspect of IR and UV photography in great detail.

Len






On Feb 5, 2007, at 7:38 PM, Adam Bridge wrote:

> I am sure hoping someone who is practicing IR photography can respond?
> I'd also find the answer valuable.
>
> Adam
>
> On 2/3/07, Lottermoser George <imagist3@mac.com> wrote:
>> Could some of you IR photographers please comment on comparison of:
>>
>> Dark Red 092 (89B)
>> The nearly opaque B&W 46 mm Dark Red Infrared (092 = 89B) Filter,
>> which looks dark purplish-red when held in front of a light source,
>> blocks visible light up to 650 nm, and passes only 50% of the
>> radiation just below 700 nm (thus the dark red color). From 730 nm to
>> 2000 nm, transmission is greater than 90%; This makes photographs of
>> pure red and infrared images possible with the best utilization of
>> the relatively low sensitivity of infrared films As the sensitization
>> of infrared black and white films barely extends beyond 1000 nm, the
>> red portion that is transmitted still makes a relevant contribution
>> to the exposure; That is why this filter is the preferred filter for
>> pictorial photography on IR black and white film.
>>
>> and
>>
>> 093 (87C)
>> Removes complete visible spectrum. This B&W 46 mm 093 (87C) Infrared
>> Glass Filter blocks the entire visible spectrum, so to our eyes it
>> looks completely opaque. Unlike the B&W 092 infrared filter, it makes
>> pure infrared photographs possible without the visible red component.
>> Its transmission only begins to exceed 1% at 800 nm, rising to 88% at
>> 900 nm, and remains that high far beyond the upper limit of
>> sensitization covered by infrared films. This filter is used less
>> frequently in pictorial photography because of the dramatic loss of
>> effective ISO. In the scientific field, materials research and
>> forensics, the limitation to a strictly infrared range is often
>> important.
>>
>> How do these descriptions translate into real world use (exposure,
>> focus compensation, etc.) and relative "look" of IR images?
>>
>> TIA for helping me learn about this field.
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george@imagist.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] IR filters)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] IR filters)