Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Brian, That is the conclusion I came to after trying both LR and Elements 5.0. After working on an image in LR, I could not do a "Save As" and put it back in the original folder. I was forced to export it to a special folder. I prefer Elements 5.0 in this respect. I did note that, when I pulled images off of my external hard drive, which is not powered when I am not using it, even Elements 5.0 tries to find the source of these images if one views the stored que of images that have been edited. However, this can be avoided, and is not a real downer. Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Reid" <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:43 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Lightroom & Bridge > >> http://www.outbackphoto.com/artofraw/raw_31/essay_develop.html > > If these comments from the Outback Photo review of Lightroom are true, > then I'm going to have a hard time liking it. Taken together, these mean > that you have to commit to Lightroom in order to use it; you can't use it > when you choose, like Bridge: > > > * If you move files inside LR folders the same files will also be moved on > disk. > > * If you move files out of the folders that are mirrored in LR with other > tools LR will find these image originals missing and allows to re-link > them. > > * If you add files to the original folders from the outside LR won't see > them unless you import the files. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >