Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]DAMN, Hoppy! She sure looks a hell of a lot better in the Photoshopped (second) version;^) Ric On Jan 31, 2007, at 6:05 PM, G Hopkinson wrote: > Wade, I have the Elmarit M 90 (the current one). I am extremely > happy with its performance. > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/a/F2/Dad_portrait.jpg.html> > > <http://tinyurl.com/2vevq8> > > You can de-fang it for a more romantic style portrait with our > friend, Photoshop. > > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/a/F2/Casual+_portrait_+ver > +2.jpg.html> > > <http://tinyurl.com/2vm8hx> > > > Handling wise, it's a compact package on the camera, partly of > course because it's a 2.8. I think that the 90AA is acknowledged as > technically the very best. It is considerably larger (a stop faster > of course) on your camera, which may or may not be significant > for you. > > Cheers > Hoppy > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On > Behalf Of > Wade Heninger > Sent: Thursday, 1 February 2007 07:51 > To: LUG Leica > Subject: [Leica] Portrait Lens > > Folks, > > So I'm thinking of adding a 75 or 90mm lens to my M8 kit for periodic > portraits and work when I need the reach (soccer games, ballet from > the > audience). > > I've looked at the summicron 90, the VC Lanthar 90, the Elmarit 90 > and the > VC 75. > > Any comments on which to consider? > > TIA... > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > w a d e h e n i n g e r > u s e r e x p e r i e n c e > a d o b e s y s t e m s , i n c > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information