Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I like them all (subject to horizons, crop, etc.) for one reason; there is a wonderful "look" to them, as from a 1920's textbook. These would print well on something like Epson Enhanced Matte, with a wide white border or matting. Funny, but I can see them as large gallery sized prints. Nice work. Bob On Jan 31, 2007, at 11:05, Ric Carter wrote: Phil-- I should mention that my sensitivity to unverticals is not so much professional, as a disability;^) Ric Carter http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/ricc/ On Jan 31, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Ric Carter wrote: > I like the framing of 3 best, but it really needs squaring up. The > tilted verticals bug me. > > I guess that's part of the good thing about 4, but I hate to lose the > hand on the poster. > > ric > > > > > On Jan 31, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Philippe Amard wrote: > >> May have your opinion on the three PSed versions of a single shot >> taken a couple of days ago? >> >> For my statistics, could you let me know your preference order (fast >> and easy) : >> >> WoS1 = >> WoS2 = >> WoS3 = >> >> Perhaps, time permitting, you could also let me know why - a bit more >> demanding but it would certainly help me more :-[ . >> >> Any comments and advice most welcome - good or bad for the former. >> Thanks in anticipation. >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/> >> Yours >> Phileicangemix >> >> PS: N? 4 is simply a BW n?3 - Oh yes, the link ! >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/?g2_page=1> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information