Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited
From: ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Wed Jan 31 10:23:31 2007
References: <45C0C56C.6040702@numericable.fr>
 
I like the framing of 3 best, but it really needs squaring up. The  
tilted verticals bug me.

I guess that's part of the good thing about 4, but I hate to lose the  
hand on the poster.

ric




On Jan 31, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Philippe Amard wrote:

> May have your opinion on the three PSed versions of a single shot  
> taken a couple of days ago?
>
> For my statistics, could you let me know your preference order  
> (fast and easy) :
>
> WoS1 =
> WoS2 =
> WoS3 =
>
> Perhaps, time permitting, you could also let me know why - a bit  
> more demanding but it would certainly help me more :-[ .
>
> Any comments and advice most welcome - good or bad for the former.
> Thanks in anticipation.
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/>
> Yours
> Phileicangemix
>
> PS: N? 4 is simply a BW n?3 - Oh yes, the link ! <http:// 
> gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/?g2_page=1>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited)
Reply from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited)
 In reply to: Message from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited)