Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ric, I use a Series VI slip-on adapter that takes Series VI filters and a Series VI shade. The shade is round, 1.75" in diameter, and the combined depth of the adapter and shade is only 0.625". It seems to take care of business for me. Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ric Carter" <ricc@mindspring.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 3:51 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: PAW 4 dlridings Now Summitar > Do you guys find that it needs a good shade, or does it even make a > difference? > > I've got one I haven't used a lot. The shade kinda defeats the > compactness of the collapsible. > > Ric > > > On Jan 28, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Luis Ripoll wrote: > >> Jim, >> >> I absolutely agree with the " ....Summitar _is_ a very underestimated >> lens. >> I liked it like that (before) because it allowed me to pick one up at a >> decent price...." >> >> For curiosity....what do you mind for a decent price?, I've paid for >> mine >> about 200$, and I'm fully satisfied with it, please look at these >> examples: >> >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5210114 >> >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5210116 >> >> I think you and me ... And many other Luggers we have a lot of things in >> common, ahhhh! The romantic old stuff! Is like a old whisky more than 18 >> years old!, that I like very much too! >> >> Saludos cordiales >> Luis >> >> >> -----Mensaje original----- >> De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org >> [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre >> de >> Daniel Ridings >> Enviado el: domingo, 28 de enero de 2007 21:44 >> Para: Leica Users Group >> Asunto: Re: [Leica] IMG: PAW 4 dlridings >> >> Thanks Don, Jim and Luis, >> >> Don ... I'm glad you suggested that. I guess you could tell I was a >> little >> unsure about these. There was something in them that I liked, but I >> hadn't >> succeeded in pulling it out. It was something abstract that I felt was >> there. I felt that when I saw them, before I took them, I just couldn't >> put >> my finger on it. >> >> Jim, the Summitar _is_ a very underestimated lens. I liked it like that >> (before) because it allowed me to pick one up at a decent price. >> >> The bokeh can get dominating when you shoot it wide-open at close focus, >> but >> once you get the hang of it, it is a nice lens, no doubt about it. >> >> Thanks all! >> Daniel >> >> >> On 1/28/07, Don Dory <don.dory@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Daniel, >>> I rather like the bottom image. Take a look at it with the background >>> line of trees cropped out; it becomes a more interesting abstract to my >> eyes. >>> >>> Don >>> don.dory@gmial.com >>> >>> On 1/28/07, Daniel Ridings <dlridings@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> It's been a cold, damp week: >>>> >>>> http://www.dlridings.com/paw2007/4.html >>>> >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >