Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]True, but it was there when one needed it. The 24-85 by Canon, however, is(was) a great lens, during its short film era, for web and brochure work. s.d. On Jan 27, 2007, at 5:17 AM, Christopher Williams wrote: > True, but at 24 it was not that great. > > Chris > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Slobodan Dimitrov" > <s.dimitrov@charter.net> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> > Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 1:05 AM > Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: December wedding images > > >> They had that 24-120 out before anyone else figured out the need/ >> desire for such a range by the public. >> s.d. >> On Jan 26, 2007, at 9:17 PM, Christopher Williams wrote: >>> About the only thing Nikon can top them on.............super wides. >>> Chris >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Slobodan Dimitrov" Subject: >>> Re: [Leica] Re:December wedding images >>> >>> >>>> I wish Canon would wise up with it's wide lens selection. >>>> s.d. >>>> On Jan 26, 2007, at 6:47 PM, Christopher Williams wrote: >>>>> I think I finally got the hang of it. Yes, it is a nice lens >>>>> to use. Love the 2.8 >>>>> >>>>> Chris >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information