Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG Don's PAW week 3
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Mon Jan 22 18:15:49 2007
References: <9b678e0701211751s2bd987e8w628f6acb1cb49283@mail.gmail.com> <002301c73dcd$e5d01d80$6501a8c0@asus930> <9b678e0701221733o1de89a16kdd8a7ef94d8a195a@mail.gmail.com> <001201c73e8f$f1c6c6d0$6501a8c0@asus930>

Hoppy,
I have been doing macro for a very long time so I have many, many options.
If you want to use your M then a Viso II or III with a LTM to Viso adapter
will let you use extension tubes and enlarging lenses very cheaply.  Or,
stock up on an R4(dirt cheap) a couple of R extension tubes and a 180
preferably one of the APO's.  R bellows are also pretty cheap as well.  Or,
you can use a short tele like a 90 Summicron and the inappropriate Elpro.
All of these options will cost about $500 US if you are starting from
scratch.

Possibly a better option would be to acquire a 180 ED Nikkor and a 6T with
possibly an extension tube.  The old tubes for an F are amazingly cheap but
will force you to shoot pretty close to wide open as you are at working
aperture.  Alternatively, get a male to male 62-52 adapter and use a
50 F1.8reversed in front of that 180 and you will be amazed at what
you will see.

Really, macro can be very cheap to get into if you start with a pretty good
lens.

Nikon is still pretty expensive, for example, I picked up a Canon F1n for
$100 and spent another $100 for a CLA.  I did this as I had found a 200
macro FD for $250 so this lens pretty much stays glued to the F1.  End
result is a very capable system for $450; considering that the new 180 is
over a grand and the new Nikon 100 is over $700 and I am a pretty happy
camper.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com

On 1/22/07, G Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
> Don, I think that the macro thing is starting to call to me as well. Then
> I start thinking about what's required to make it happen
> with an M old way or new way. Or buy an older R (for cost) then glass for
> it. Then I think, be rational, to have a play I could get
> a macro for my Nikon manual focus slr's cheaply. Then I start thinking
> about the Zeiss ZF Planar 100 macro, (have you seen the MTF
> graphs for that lens!)then I realise I'm back at the second mortgage
> point. I think its called technolust!
>
> Cheers
> Hoppy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG Don's PAW week 3
>
> Hoppy,
> Thank you for the compliment.  If the demons at work give in somewhat I
> may
> do an abbreviated series this year.  Last year I played around a lot with
> bad lenses used up close and this year I might try traditional macro shots
> with a somewhat different viewpoint.
>
> Don
> don.dory@gmail.com
>
> On 1/21/07, G Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > Don, that's a great shot of the camellia. I love the colour and the
> sharp
> > droplet.
> > Cheers
> > Hoppy
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] IMG Don's PAW week 3)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG Don's PAW week 3)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] IMG Don's PAW week 3)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG Don's PAW week 3)