Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/01/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] RE: LUG Digest, Vol 33, Issue 549
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Thu Jan 11 11:26:25 2007
References: <200701111333.l0BDUUW5029716@server1.waverley.reid.org> <724FDD310638E147AD8E509D15FFB73183F47F@exchange.microassist.local> <3cad89990701110933ha6362dfkcd2c3db8ba8b61c@mail.gmail.com> <F0F12715-84E4-43C4-8F7F-5D7EA351C8BE@mac.com> <p0623090ec1cc2a1ed35e@[10.1.16.144]> <811AEFEA-E39C-4909-BD56-7F03EE2202EC@mac.com>
At 12:19 PM -0600 1/11/07, Lottermoser George wrote:
>True enough. The 5D is a bit better. But I continue to lust for the
>DMR for my wonderful R8. Hopefully in another year or so Doug H will
>have to dump his to me because it'll be 3 years old ;~)
>
>Regards,
>George Lottermoser
>george@imagist.com
>
>
>
>On Jan 11, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Henning Wulff wrote:
>
>>However, if they made a 20D with a better viewfinder.... :-)
I use the 5D as well, and have a couple of BrightScreens for it.
Quite good, but the 5D is again larger than the 20D, and doesn't have
the pixel density of the 20D for telephoto stuff.
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com
Replies:
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Re: pixel density)
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Re: brightscreens)
In reply to:
Message from snasta at microassist.net (Sanjay Nasta) ([Leica] RE: LUG Digest, Vol 33, Issue 549)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] RE: LUG Digest, Vol 33, Issue 549)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] RE: LUG Digest, Vol 33, Issue 549)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] RE: LUG Digest, Vol 33, Issue 549)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] RE: LUG Digest, Vol 33, Issue 549)