Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If the www is there, it is just part of the name. Using www or not using www is a matter of personal taste. I dislike it and never use it, but I always enable it as an alternative. For example, even though I always advertise the LUG photo contest as contest.leica-users.org, I have defined an alias www.contest.leica-users.org for those who feel a need to type the www. The http:// is, technically, the access protocol. If you enter into your browser a name without the http:// in front, it will immediately prefix that onto the name string before trying to open the page. The function that it serves here on the LUG is that most mail readers won't spot and highlight a URL that does not begin with an access method. So contest.leica.users.org is not clickable in most mailers http://contest.leica-users.org is clickable in most mailers So the function served here by the "http://" is "Hey! Mail reading program! Yes, you! This is a URL. Make it clickable." AOL doesn't do this, but pretty much all other mail readers do. > I don't understand, though, the need (or not) for the http:// or the > www. Sometimes there are both. sometimes just one. Sometimes none. what > is the best way to send any URL, just copy it from the address line of > the browser? Jesse