Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Not very surprising - he is a guy who made some money in software, and he is using that to try to become a guru in photography. You can read him running for cover on his site. A site like his is only good for confirming your own prejudices, nothing else. Members of this list are much more reliable than any magazine/net review...After all they are willing to debate the issues ;-) . Cheers Jayanand B. D. Colen wrote: >Re-read that Pop Photo item that was posted the other day - I believe the >first place it occurred was in the Luminous Landscape rave, but I may be >mistaken. IF I recall that one correctly, the reviewer acknowledged allowing >Leica to see his review before posting it; he has acknowledged withholding >the information in order to give Leica a chance to fix the problem. > > >On 11/18/06 10:18 AM, "Brian Reid" <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> wrote: > > > >>>certain reviewers, upon whom they depend ... were aware of >>>the defect and, at the request of the company, withheld mention of it in >>>their rave reviews? >>> >>> >>What is your source for this statement? I don't remember seeing any >>evidence >>of this. >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Leica Users Group. >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > >