[Leica] KEH

[jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith)]

Now that you mention it, I don't peruse e**y anymore. I peruse KEH instead. 

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com
http://400tx.blogspot.com/



-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Rob
McClure
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 10:22 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] KEH


I agree with Jeffery about KEH -- have bought much and never been 
disappointed.  If you are, they have a very lenient inspection/return 
period and even a warranty on most used items.  That's why I prefer to 
buy from them than that auction site that cannot be mentioned.  There 
prices are generally better, too.

Rob McClure
On Nov 16, 2006, at 11:15 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:

> They are very generous to the customer in this regard, but do take 
> into account the age of the camera. Thus, an Ex+ Leica lens made 
> within the past 10 years will be like new, but an Ex+ Rolleiflex from 
> 1955 won't be quite so
> pristine. But I have never gotten anything from them that was lower 
> than
> their rating. I bought some Pentax 42 screwmount Takumars that look 
> like
> they were made yesterday.
>
> And if you aren't satisfied, you can return it for a refund.
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
> http://400tx.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
> Philippe
> Orlent
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 6:26 PM
> To: LUG Group
> Subject: [Leica] KEH
>
>
> Are their descriptions and ratings for 2nd hand items trusteable?
>
> Thanks,
> Philippe
> \


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information