Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] three...
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Thu Nov 9 09:31:41 2006
References: <532BF1A3-3399-4CBF-876B-3AE46CF62589@cox.net> <4552812C.9020301@waltjohnson.com>

On Nov 8, 2006, at 6:15 PM, Walt Johnson wrote:

> Now Steve, there aren't any more photographically inclined  here  
> than you are. That is a fact.....


thanks Walt, that's incredibly nice of you to say...

but all I've got is my gut, as I am totally un-schooled  (or perhaps   
optimistically, but unrealistically "self-schooled"  ...)

Steve



>
> Walt
> Steve Barbour wrote:
>
>> either in spite of, or because of,  its faults.... I like this  
>> image...
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/three.jpg.html
>>
>>
>> I just go by my gut, but I'm wondering if others more   
>> photographically inclined may have helpful comments...
>>
>> thanks for looking,
>>
>> and your thoughts,
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] three...)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] three...)