Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Len: I don't disagree with you, I like them both for different reasons as well. Thanks for looking and for your comments. Jim Leonard Taupier wrote: > I'm going to vote in the other direction. If you open both bridge > photos and compare them directly, you see the Ektar25 color is a little > brighter and more pastel in tone. The Kodachrome has deeper and more > natural color. If you compare the two folders, the Ektar25 folder is > more forward with the bright red and orange colors. I like the Ektar > photos better but the Kodachrome colors better. In any case these are > fantastic fall images. Well done. > > Len > > > On Nov 8, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Luis Ripoll wrote: > >> I don't know..., but for me Ektar looks better >> >> Saludos desde Barcelona >> Luis >> >> -----Mensaje original----- >> De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org >> [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En >> nombre de >> Jim Hemenway >> Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 08 de noviembre de 2006 21:55 >> Para: LUG >> Asunto: [Leica] Luminosity >> >> I hope that you'll like the luminosity in most of these taken with my >> spare R8 prior to selling it to a member of this group: >> http://www.half-fast.com//R8-Ektar25-Oct9-13-2006/ >> Ektar 25 color negative film >> >> As a comparison, these (posted earlier) were taken about the same time >> with Kodachrome 200 in a Pentax MX: >> http://www.half-fast.com/MX-Kodachrome-Oct8-10-2006/ >> >> I've been told by someone on the Kodachrome list that Kodak High >> Resolution" film is actually Ektar 400... can anyone here confirm? >> >> Comments are cheerfully accepted! >> >> Jim