Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks, that would have been my guess, and preference as well Cheers On 13/10/2006, at 3:16, mehrdad wrote: > the 28-90 asph is better than the 35-70 f4 > > On 10/11/06, Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au> wrote: >> I'm using the current 28 to 90 and the 35 to 70 is the f4 version. >> >> Cheers >> >> > there are 4 versions of the 35~70mm lens? which one areyou talking >> > about, i have three of them including the 35-70 2.8 and also the >> > 28-90. the 28~ 90 is better than all but of 35-70 mm lens and on >> par >> > with the 2.8 version >> > >> > On 10/11/06, Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au> wrote: >> >> Someone told me the 28 -90 zoom was clearly inferior to the 35 >> to 70: >> >> anyone have a comment? I was going to test one against the >> other before >> >> selling the 35 to 70. >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> >> >> Alastair >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Leica Users Group. >> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more >> information >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > ------------------------------------- >> > regards, mehrdad >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Leica Users Group. >> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more >> information >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > -- > ------------------------------------- > regards, mehrdad > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information