Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LHSA meeting in Wetzlar; Leica Camera AG
From: eric.calderwood at btinternet.com (Eric Calderwood)
Date: Thu Oct 12 13:44:10 2006

As far as I have been led to understand a RAW File is the complete
unadulterated output from the sensor and nothing else at all.

A RAW file is the digital equivalent of a Negative.

Eric


On 12/10/06 19:59, "Nathan Wajsman" <nathan@nathanfoto.com> wrote:

> This is indeed what one of the guys at the Leica stand told me--that the
> corrections applied by the 6 dots have an impact on the RAW files, not
> just the JPEGs. Of course, being a cynical economist, I suspect that he
> may just have been telling me that in order to entice someone who only
> shoots RAW to nevertheless spend the money on the magic dots...
> 
> Nathan
> 
> Lottermoser George wrote:
>> It would seem to me that even a RAW file has had some firmware
>> software applied to it. In theory as little as possible before post
>> processing - but some never the less. If my suspicions are true - then
>> the firmware software could indeed apply some correction to a RAW file.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george@imagist.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 11, 2006, at 9:32 PM, mehrdad wrote:
>> 
>>> as the raw
>>> software shipped with this camera does not do anything with the info
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 



Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] LHSA meeting in Wetzlar; Leica Camera AG)
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] LHSA meeting in Wetzlar; Leica Camera AG)
In reply to: Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] LHSA meeting in Wetzlar; Leica Camera AG)