Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:IIIf vs. 5D
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Wed Sep 27 07:16:57 2006
References: <2299E479-2252-4A00-9521-0E1A92346968@mac.com><013101c6e246$85887ae0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <12FCFA03-D5E1-4B66-B6B3-0FF03799C4A7@mac.com>
 
Tell him next time bring a SPARE.

Chris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kenneth Frazier" 
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:IIIf vs. 5D


> 
> On Sep 27, 2006, at 11:06 AM, Christopher Williams wrote:
> 
> > Local pro my ass. Everybody's a pro nowadays. One dSLR and they're a
> > professional.
> >
> > Chris
> 
> That's how HE is advertised.  And, I gather, how he is paid.
> 
>   I reserve judgment.
> 
> Ken
In reply to: Message from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] IIIf vs. 5D)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:IIIf vs. 5D)
Message from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] Re:IIIf vs. 5D)