Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Too many big words there for me! :) Sharpening is inevitable? Never did it with film, why do we have to with digital???? Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "G Hopkinson" <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 5:50 PM Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: BW modes > Chris if you are taking that continuous curve analog light and sampling it to discrete steps, it just must be softer. Sharpening is > inevitable. Of course just how smart the algorithm is that restores that lost apparent sharpness, where it happens and how much > control you want over the process is the biggie. > > Cheers > Hoppy > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Christopher Williams > Sent: Saturday, 16 September 2006 02:12 > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: [Leica] Re: BW modes > > Simply converting a color image to BW sucks. Too many levels, curves to work > with getting a good BW out of a color image. If I had a BW RAW to deal with, > I'd already have custom curves ready to work with the images. Saves at least > one step for me. That's allot of saving IMO. > > That's the problem I think now. Too many crap tools! Perhaps actually having > a digital image that you do not have to sharpen is a start? Even sharp prime > lenses need sharpening. > > I'd take that motorized SP and beat the shite out of that Rebel. > > Chris > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don Dory" <don.dory@gmail.com> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> > Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 10:01 AM > Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: BW modes > > > > Come on Chris, > > This would work fine if "convert to grayscale" made you happy. Or if you > > simply desaturated your images which is the same thing as a B&W imaging > > would do. In fairness this is not entirely correct wrt pixel density and > > ability to see finer detail. > > > > Face it, many images work better if you apply a little filtration as you > > convert to B&W. And you are still going to adjust levels, curves, > possibly > > a little dodging or burning so maybe you would only spend 2.5 hours > getting > > your images up to your standards. Last, as expensive as you are per hour, > > it is still cheaper than sending 50 rolls of film to the lab. > > > > We are never happy, photographers have more tools that are better than > they > > have ever been and still we grump. Sometime pick up a motorised SP from > the > > late fifties and compare that with a lowly film Rebel. Size, weight, > > framing rate, available lenses, TTL flash capability, and metering are all > > much better today for less money even before inflation. But hey, you > could > > at least buy a F1.1 lens for your Nikon then. > > > > Don > > don.dory@gmail.com > > > > > > On 9/15/06, Christopher Williams <leicachris@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > > > > > > I'd love to have full BW RAW mode, no color converting at all. Save even > > > more time when I'm dealing with 800-1600 images from a wedding. Now that > > > we're getting into even more megapixel's in cameras, anything to speed > up > > > processing. Try converting 500 or more color RAW images to BW jpeg on a > > > D1x > > > with 10mp interpolation on! > > > > > > Also I hate that clients just consider "well, you can just change it to > BW > > > later right?". I want the BW capture first! I want Neopan 1600 in a 10mp > > > camera GD! > > > > > > There was talk from Leica on a BW only digital M. Special limited > edition > > > matte chrome Bresson Digital BW M8.5 camera, only $9999 > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "G Hopkinson" > > > Subject: RE: [Leica] Re BW modes > > > > > > > > > > B.D., yes, got that you were championing original RAW capture. > > > > I understand and agree from my limited knowledge. > > > > I've only played with a couple of RAW files (from a D70 user) as an > > > educational exercise, but is it not only adding a channel mix > > > > choice to the workflow? Meanwhile still preserving all of the RGB info > > > as > > > options? > > > > Maybe I'm being too simplistic, but is the sensor capture > fundamentally > > > not b/w, with filters/alterations applied to produce the > > > > three channels? > > > > I can't see that actually being commercially viable to pursue but I > can > > > see b/w as a minority output choice, being most versatile > > > > coming from the three channels. Maybe I'm just overly b/w from colour > > > scan > > > fixated? > > > > I really want to understand better. > > > > All knowledge is golden, someone wise said. > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Hoppy > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Leica Users Group. > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information