Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Video of M8
From: grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com)
Date: Wed Sep 13 13:43:15 2006

BD,

This is very true, however, it is only obsolete if it no longer does what 
you bought it to do.  Irregardless of what is being put out currently.  For 
quiter a few on this list, the III f works prefectly for their needs, even 
though the M series is way more convienient and flexible.  It may be 
obsolete by todays standards, but fo those who love it and use it daily it 
is perfectly suited for their needs and it is the perfect camera.

Gene


-------------- Original message from "B. D. Colen" <bd@bdcolenphoto.com>: 
-------------- 


> Fascinating, Richard, and I agree with most of it. But keep one important 
> factor in mind - the M8, wonderful as it may be, and I really do believe 
> it 
> will be wonderful as far as it goes - will not, repeat not, hold its value 
> the way the film cameras did. Like any other digital it will, at this 
> point 
> in the Digital Evolution, be dated-on-arrival. It will be, Ernie noted, 
> computer with a lens attached - as is every other digital. And it will be 
> way overpriced for what it delivers in terms of image size and features. 
> So 
> while it may be terrific, it will be as much an economic trip down the 
> crapper as buying a Nikon D200, or an Olympus anything. ;-) 
> 
> 
> On 9/13/06 10:31 AM, "Richard Clompus" wrote: 
> 
> > I find the M8 a bit intriguing. I wrote a piece how "film died for 
> > me" a few years ago on the LUG. I look back over the last ten years 
> > in photography and realize how fast film has gone from what you need 
> > to use to make photographs to almost being irrelevant. I ended up 
> > selling most of my R system but for some reason that's hard to 
> > explain, I've held onto my M Leica bodies and lenses. I still enjoy 
> > looking through thousands of slides but find the advantages of 
> > digital too hard to ignore. I've become a better photographer with 
> > digital because I learn from my mistakes faster and can takes loads 
> > of pictures as I explore new concepts. I had a B&W wet darkroom and 
> > was OK as a printer but not great because I couldn't find enough time 
> > to really experiment. Then when I finally nailed a print, it was 
> > always hard to go back the next session and make duplicate copies 
> > again for friends. Once I nail the print with CS2 and the R2400 
> > printer, I can make as many copies for gifts as I need. 
> > 
> > It seems every time I spend big money on a Leica, it hurts in the 
> > beginning but holds its value over time. My wife and friends think 
> > I'm nuts to spend that much money on a camera or lens but to have the 
> > equivalent of an M7 that's digital (now M8) puts me right where I 
> > want to be. For the past few months, I've been using a Ricoh 
> > digital GR. Great camera but without manual focus and a rangefinder, 
> > its still a Point & Shoot. 
> > 
> > I'll be in line for an M8 like many of you wondering if its worth the 
> > price. Hopefully the photos will convince me it was worth it. 
> > 
> > Richard Clompus, OD 
> > Ponte VEdra Beach, FL 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > Leica Users Group. 
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Leica Users Group. 
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 

Replies: Reply from bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Video of M8)