Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: DMR for nature work (was: Re: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
From: firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin)
Date: Tue Sep 5 01:39:07 2006
References: <44FA25D8.3030006@adrenaline.com><004501c6cefe$b6976cf0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <44FA3B99.6020105@adrenaline.com> <009201c6cf18$0386f9e0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <667e9af89b81d2d50135b9b26d715c80@earthlink.net> <7922F8A9-539B-4606-82E6-D8746DBBBC83@ncable.net.au> <5f48586fbd8d3b5198bbd03150f67b26@earthlink.net>

Thanks Doug: we carried 2 spare batteries to Antarctica. For the  
Arctic, we will have a cabin and can recharge there, so with enough  
backup batteries, we would be ok. One limiting factor I found is how  
long it took to download the days images to our back up. My iPod  
could not cope with a full 2 gig transfer and it had to be split up  
before I tried. A real pain and I lost images because of it.

Cheers
On 04/09/2006, at 22:33, Douglas Herr wrote:

> On Sep 4, 2006, at 1:51 AM, Alastair Firkin wrote:
>
>> I have been thrashing around since I came home from the Antarctic.  
>> My Hasselblad shots were few and far between in success, but the  
>> Olympus Digital was certainly a winner. So it occurred to me that  
>> with Helen winning a trip to the arctic, I may be forced to look  
>> at digital: perhaps the DMR. How do you find it handles for nature  
>> work?
>>
>> Cheers
>
> The biggest problem as I see it is battery life.  I find that the  
> battery lasts for about 2 Gb of photos (RAW files), less with  
> chimping, so a second battery and a means of charging are  
> essential.  For car-camping it's not a problem; for backpacking I'd  
> look in to a solar charger or a different camera.
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) (DMR for nature work (was: Re: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)))
In reply to: Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) (DMR for nature work (was: Re: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)))