Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/09/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: DMR for nature work
From: telyt at telus.net (David Young)
Date: Mon Sep 4 08:18:25 2006
References: <44FA25D8.3030006@adrenaline.com> <004501c6cefe$b6976cf0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <44FA3B99.6020105@adrenaline.com> <009201c6cf18$0386f9e0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <667e9af89b81d2d50135b9b26d715c80@earthlink.net> <7922F8A9-539B-4606-82E6-D8746DBBBC83@ncable.net.au> <5f48586fbd8d3b5198bbd03150f67b26@earthlink.net> <82c9dd70609040755y76bb6ades562e2a18344831d3@mail.gmail.com>
At 04/09/2006, you wrote:
>Doug - I get about 400-500 raw images per battery.
>
>Eric
>
>
>On 9/4/06, Douglas Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>The biggest problem as I see it is battery life. I find that the
>>battery lasts for about 2 Gb of photos (RAW files), less with chimping,
>>so a second battery and a means of charging are essential. For
>>car-camping it's not a problem; for backpacking I'd look in to a solar
>>charger or a different camera.
>>
>>Doug Herr
How do you do this, Eric? Like Doug, I get about 100 - 130 shots per
battery/charge - with moderate "chimping" & deleting. I do, however,
turn off the LCD's "review" feature, which is both annoying and a
waste of battery power. I carry two 2 gig cards, and 2 batteries,
which is normally enough for me, for a day.
---
David Young,
Logan Lake, CANADA
Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/
Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt
Replies:
Reply from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] Re: DMR for nature work)
Reply from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Re: DMR for nature work)
In reply to:
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) (DMR for nature work (was: Re: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)))
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) (DMR for nature work (was: Re: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)))