Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/09/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)
From: telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr)
Date: Sun Sep 3 03:55:31 2006
References: <44FA25D8.3030006@adrenaline.com><004501c6cefe$b6976cf0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <44FA3B99.6020105@adrenaline.com> <009201c6cf18$0386f9e0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <667e9af89b81d2d50135b9b26d715c80@earthlink.net> <44FAA8B1.4000108@adrenaline.com>
On Sep 3, 2006, at 3:04 AM, Scott McLoughlin wrote:
> So there's an interesting datapoint. What's the nature of the
> difference
> between the DMR and a D70/D200? Firmware? Inquiring minds want
> to know :-)
>
I'm sure the firmware has something to do with it, and I'm also willing
to bet that 16-bit capture and processing vs. interpolation from fewer
bits makes a difference too.
Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
In reply to:
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))