Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Pictures of the new TRI-Elmar and sensational new finder
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Sun Aug 27 16:25:16 2006
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20060827225558.0316eeb0@screengang.com> <4cfa589b0608271621i4594925bh47c9c8832b9f1e7d@mail.gmail.com>

shifted browsers and now it works....go figure....thank heavens for FireFox

ab

On 8/27/06, Adam Bridge <abridge@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can't get to this page - I get a "too many redirects" complaint from
> my browser.
>
> Adam
>
>
> On 8/27/06, Didier Ludwig <rangefinder@screengang.com> wrote:
> >  From a reliable source:
> >
> > http://mogool.com/transfer/TRI-ELMAR-16-18-21.JPG
> >
> > The Tri-Elmar's widest aperture is f4 as guessed in my previous post.
> > Looks slightly fatter than the 28-35-50 Tri-Elmar.
> >
> > But the more sensational thing seems to be this new finder. Looks
> > like the framelines are switchable. The wheel at the top front seems
> > to have indexes for 28-24-21-18-16 (that's all variations of the new
> > tri-elmar for fullframe and cropped). Can't really read the indexes
> > of the wheel behind it. Are these focal lengths or distance marks?
> > The index closest to the back seems to be an infinity sign, but I'm
> > not shure. I expect the parallax is likely adjusted with the weel at
> > the bottom, close to the hotshoe mount? Does the top wheel behind
> > eventually offer even more framelines for other focal lengths?
> >
> > Didier
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>

In reply to: Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Pictures of the new TRI-Elmar and sensational new finder)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Pictures of the new TRI-Elmar and sensational new finder)