Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PAW 34 dlridings
From: don.dory at (Don Dory)
Date: Sun Aug 27 06:35:29 2006
References: <>

That Leica glow is fantastic on your daughter and wife, or maybe they just
glow.  Good to see another shot of your son looking only mildly perturbed
thea you are taking another picture and why aren't you done yet.

Gasp, you have cars and parking lots where you live.  In all your years of
posting, I think the only cars I have seen were on some of your 21mm shots
on your walk to work a couple of years ago.  Good test of flare resistance


On 8/27/06, Daniel Ridings <> wrote:
> Right before I left for my trip I bid and won on a defective 90/4.0
> Elmar on the auction place. It was a black one and I was warned that
> it would need cleaning. It cost less than $35 so I did it more or less
> on a chance.
> It was waiting for me when I got back and looked as desribed. I took
> it apart and cleaned it, but couldn't get the stains in the coating
> off on one of the inner elements.
> One thing led to another and I ended up with an Elmar for the M as
> well (the lense cost about the same as an LTM->M adapter would have).
> The 90 Elmars are pretty cheap. Probably for good reasons:
> The screwmount one is represented here:
> The shoebox with other samples:
> All Tri-X and HC110.
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See for more information

Replies: Reply from dlridings at (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] PAW 34 dlridings)
In reply to: Message from dlridings at (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] PAW 34 dlridings)