Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] On 50s
From: jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Mon Aug 21 05:39:10 2006

An impossibility.

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com
http://400tx.blogspot.com/



-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Ric
Carter
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 8:49 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] On 50s


I would not have thought that possible, and hope that it does not  
indicate that you think them not worth owning;^)

Ric


On Aug 20, 2006, at 9:26 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:

> Bad show. You've chosen the only three 50's in existence that I
> don't own.
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
> http://400tx.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
> Ric
> Carter
> Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 7:45 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: [Leica] On 50s
>
>
> Okay, I now there are several 50s freaks out there.
>
> No, not as in baby boomers or as in Bill Haley fans;^) - I mean 50mm
> lens afficianados.
>
> I didn't much care a 50 until I started using Leica. I have become
> quite attached to them though.
>
> Without intention, I find myself with three 50s now: a Summitar LTM
> (980 xxx Wetzlar), a second generation 'Cron (209x xxx Wetzlar ~'65-6
> chrome), and a fifth version 'Cron (316x xxx Canada ~'81-2 black).
>
> I understand the size advantages of the Summitar collapsed and that
> it's not a bad performer.
>
> I am just now starting using the chrome second version. I am more
> accustomed to the black fifth (my first leica lens). So far, the most
> disturbing thing about the older version is the infinity lock which
> bugs me on distant focusing by locking at inopportune times. It just
> seems something else to distract. I have not yet shot enough to
> distinguish performance differences.
>
> Anyway, what are your ideas on the relative virtues of each of these?
> Are there advantages to each? Is there a time to use one over the  
> other?
>
> Thanks for any thoughts you folks may have.
>
> Ric Carter
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/Passing-Fancies
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] On 50s)