Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Digital image longevity
From: jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Thu Aug 17 08:00:47 2006
References: <200608141445.k7EEj3NT012551@server1.waverley.reid.org> <"E7BF209 C -C607-4133-A671-E11CFD537F3B"@optonline.net> <"44E2AA6A.500 0801"@nathanfoto.com> <"7.0.1.0.2.20060816102 017.026dce08"@infoave.net> <44E384AF.80401@nathanfoto.com> <44E3E837.7000607@eth.net> <44E3F9B7.1010402@nathanfoto.com>

This FAQ says that  there is not much difference after all:
http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html#4.3.1
See para 4.3.6

This guy likes DVD+R for Computers:
http://www.thetechlounge.com/article/117/DVD+Formats+Which+is+for+Me/

Cheers
Jayanand


Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> But then I wonder why all the archival DVDs I see out there are of the 
> -R variety.
>
> Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
>
>> Tina,
>>
>> If remember right, DVD+R is more accurate, and thus better for non 
>> volatile archiving (music,film,data,photos), and DVD-R is better for 
>> compatibility, i.e.,it will play on most stand alone DVD players...
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jayanand
>>
>> Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Tina, I will look into that. Or perhaps I will just start 
>>> using the Powerbook to burn the DVDs--I think it is agnostic w.r.t. 
>>> plus or minus.
>>>
>>> Nathan
>>>
>>> Tina Manley wrote:
>>>
>>>> At 01:17 AM 8/16/2006, you wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Related question: how come all the archival DVD's I see are of the 
>>>>> -R variety (like the Kodak ones on this web site)? My burner uses 
>>>>> DVD+R discs (at least the burner I have in my desktop PC, I am not 
>>>>> sure whether my Powerbook takes both flavors). Is there something 
>>>>> about the minus vs. the plus that makes it easier to produce 
>>>>> archival DVDs?
>>>>>
>>>>> Nathan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nathan -  My built-in DVD burner uses +R, too, so I bought an 
>>>> external DVD burner so I could use -R.  I've read that -R is more 
>>>> reliable and those who submit to Alamy on DVDs say that the error 
>>>> rate with -R is much less than with +R.  I don't think I'd trust +R 
>>>> as much for archival use.
>>>>
>>>> Tina
>>>>
>>>> Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA
>>>> http://www.tinamanley.com
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>



Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Re: Digital image longevity)
In reply to: Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Re: Digital image longevity)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Re: Digital image longevity)
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Re: Digital image longevity)